Much was made of...........
the blog on a certain *sin* and how one reader chooses not to read on that *sin* and yet I have been thinking that many readers place stipulations on how and what they will read on, why are they not the same?
What is different about a reader stating on her/his page they will not do general readings? is that not a judgement on how they want to read for you?
What is different about a reader stating on his/her page they will not do readings unless you are a repeat 5 star caller?
What about a no new clients reader?
What of a reader who will not do timing?
What of a reader who will not do questions, they just need some information to start and they do not want to be disturbed in their *flow* of information??
They may not be exactly the same, however they are similiar in that they set rules and or conditions under which the reader is willing to work...
How can one judge one reader negatively when many readers do the same? I for one think that all stipulations ( timing, feedback, no general readings) are the same on a general level.....they are preferences, one can refuse to take a call ( yet claim to help everyone? ) One can not want to do general readings...as is our preferences, therein lies the beauty of keen.
Just a thought..........
p.s. this is not about anyone, just a comment and thought in general about the slight bit of hypocrisy that was aimed at a reader who stated like many others that she did not want to read on a particular *sin* And Like I love to say, there before the Grace of God, go I....
p.p.s Heather, there before the grace of Dog go I .......... :-)
Joan