Keen Home  | Blog Policies  | Help
Welcome to Community Sign in | Join | Help

Tarot Excellence, Not Just Imagination

I'm not a fan of the "a card means whatever the reader feels it means to them" school of thought. Perhaps it's my Taurean nature, or maybe just my old-school training, but I would call myself a bit dogmatic when it comes to tarot card meanings.

I would begin here by first defining what we mean when we use certain words. Specifically, "intuition" or "intuitive." By intuition are we stating some sort of abnormal or unusual gift toward the psychic side of life? I'm not fond of that either. But by intuition I will say that often without obvious cause, understanding of a situation is available. Have you ever seen the movie, "A Beautiful Mind" starring Russel Crowe as the brilliant mathematician John Nash? That movie is a wonderful examination of intuition and if you research intuition from a psychological stand point you will find that the more data available to the intuitive mind, the more readily the flashes will come. Like looking at a complex tarot spread; the more cards on your table, the more likely you will get details in your reading.

I've sort of digressed there.

In order for the language of the tarot to be accurate, it must (like any language) have definitive meanings attached to its parts. Take a card, any card, and if it can happen to mean something one day and something else another day (I am not meaning slight variances in specifics, but generally and completely something different), then my definition of that card is that it is meaningless. And since I don't agree with that on general principles, perhaps it is the reader who is at fault.

Look at the 2 of Wands for instance. Any deck will do. I'll start with the Crowley deck, similar in form to the Marseille tarot, designed with rather broad concepts in mind. Simply put, all you see (at a glance) is Two Wands. Looking closer of course you may also see the symbols for Mars and Aries. You see some interesting ribbons of flame or some sort of energy. You may even know (by erudition) that the wands being depicted are called dorje and that a dorje is a Tibetan symbol of masculine force, sudden inspiration, the ‘cutting’ of ignorance and illusion. You will also see that there is a title given to this card and that title is Dominion.

23.jpg picture by Baccus93

With all that data you can now let your intuition run amok if you like. :-) More data would be nice though, wouldn't it?

Let's look at Arthur Edward Waite's design as painted by Pamela Coleman Smith.

Here we see two wands (it seems to be mandatory) but actually they are sized and shaped like staves.  Between the staves is a scholarly looking gentleman. He wears a cap and cloak famous to professors and explorers who prove their theories. He holds a globe in his hand. He is obviously depicted as high above a coastal town (look at the little building just beyond the wall of where he stands) and he looks contemplatively toward the sea. Waite doesn't give us any hint of the astrology in this card, so we have to intuit from its image and number placement in the suit that this is the initiation of power at its very beginning.

23.jpg picture by Baccus93

The Rider deck is indeed a highly intuitive deck using the word the way we do to describe computer software as being something that can be used without much instruction being required - you use it intuitively. But of course, operator error is more likely to happen if it isn't studied up on at some point.

Looking at another designer's version of this card, it can be demonstrated a) how though the general meaning of two of wands is the same, b) variances in understanding can lead to problems with readings.

From The Mythic Tarot By Juliet Sharman-Burke & Liz Greene (Illustrated by Tricia Newell)

23.jpg picture by Baccus93

"The card of the to Two of Wands portrays the young Jason standing before the Centaur Chiron's cave, poised before he sets out on his journey to reclaim his inheritance. Chiron is dimly visible in the darkness of the cave. Jason, clothed in a scarlet tunic, grips two flaming wands firmly in his hand."

Now to the heart of the matter! The two of wands, being the first non-Ace numbered card of the traditional orders of Tarot, has a great deal of significance as "The Initiator." Traditionally this card heralds new ventures and other beginnings. That would be the most general way to read this card. If the reader relates well with the images of his or her cards (speaking to them and from them), other specific words that might come out could be such as "hold the world in the palm of your hand," thus eliciting a sense of courage and confidence (also a traditional meaning of this card). Being named The Lord of Dominion in Crowley's deck, showing the lordly figure of Waite's design, and hearkening us to be aware of the mentor of Jason's myth in Newell's illustration, we might also talk about the "having influence over others" this card can suggest.  But as well, considering that I have 41 years of experience on this planet, I might also start talking about various ways I've experienced this card in my own life - talking about how I needed to be ballsy when deciding to start my own business, how when the Sun enters Aries (the first Deacon of Aries called by Crowley and others the deacon of Mars in Aries) the Will of the planet begins to bud and how nature in this way illustrates what we need to know both good and bad about this. Depending on how the card is aspected or influenced in the reading (via spread or other cards nearby, etc), we might instead talk about the obstinacy and brashness suggested by Jason's facial expression. Or we might suggest the loneliness often considered a part of this card. Or, if we knew little about traditional tarot and started only talking from the pictures we see, we could inaccurately start talking about these very same subjects or others not at all related.

My point is, a good reader will never invent entirely unrelated definitions for a card. We wouldn't look at a two of wands and start telling the querrent that we see failure in finances (not unless of course a five or seven of disks is involved or maybe the eight of cups).

Definitely find your own voice when reading tarot, but remember that the cards themselves have something to say and they know exactly how to say it in their language. Some times I just consider myself a translator.

[I am available for your tarot reading needs 24 hours a day, either Available or With Alerts On]
Published Thursday, April 21, 2011 4:26 PM by Thelemic Waves Tarot
Filed Under:

Comment Notification

Subscribe to this post's comments using RSS

Comments

Wednesday, December 23, 2009 6:34 PM by Sandipantssfu

# re: Tarot Excellence, Not Just Imagination

I love your blogs. Especially when you teach us about the tarot. Brilliant!
Thursday, December 24, 2009 2:15 PM by Lizzy

# re: Tarot Excellence, Not Just Imagination

As a card reader myself, I can somewhat disagree.  Please allow me to explain.  Although I do know what they mean, I don't follow the book meanings.  I do let the cards speak to me.  I pick up, impressions, visions, words & images.

When I read with the tarot, I am amazingly accurate even though what I get isn't necessarily what the book of meanings says.  I have many books of meanings as well so I am well versed.  I just like it that they talk to me and the information they give me, hits the nail on the head.  

For the record...... I am also a Taurus.  I have five planets in that stinking bull.  Although I prefer the term tenacious, my mother calls me pig headed:))

It just goes to show you that we all have our own methods with the cards.  Every now and then, when I do NOT get impressions and images from the cards I then rely on the book meanings, but that's once in a blue moon.  I say go with whatever works best for you.

Great blog by the way, I enjoy reading them very much.

Lizzy
Saturday, December 26, 2009 12:22 PM by Thelemic Waves Tarot

# re: Tarot Excellence, Not Just Imagination

Lizzy, I don't believe you are disagreeing. I suspect you are missing the point. Yes, use your own voice in your readings - but say example for the two of wands, which is to say "this is when potential meets opportunity," I bet if you recorded all of your readings & impressions of this card, you will find that although you aren't using always the exact phrases found in the examples that books have provided, you find that the gist is the same.

Little White Book examples are just that. Examples of collected ideas from various readers who's life experiences have shown them ways they can use the concepts embodied in each card. A two of wands is always the first decanate of Astrology mingled with the second sephiroth of the world of Emanations (known as Atziluth to the Qabalists), how you have learned to see this in play is individual to you.
Friday, March 05, 2010 3:41 PM by Iris Mystic Tarot

# re: Tarot Excellence, Not Just Imagination

From my experience the Tarot works with whatever method you decide to use.

The 2 of Wands for me has a different interpretation. I base my readings in the analysis of Crowley's Thoth Tarot made by German Jungian psychologist Gerd Ziegler.

Occasionally I use other methods, recorded in different books/systems.

Funny I started studying the Tarot with a book that gives each card a very definite interpretation according to 33 different categories, from the mundane to the profound. This system includes numerology of course, and the general meanings of each suit with the designated astrological associations. But it also offers concrete information in categories as concrete as what kind of MAIL one is going to get.

I do remember it told me I was going to hang out with a person from another country, and someone was going to try to steal a kiss from me. And when my friend from the Virgin Islands did exactly that, I laughed and just said to him, that the Tarot reading had announced something like that was going to happen.

I have a book that offers a mathematical calculation for the outcome of the situation, based on the sum of the rest of the cards in the spread (using only the Major Arcana). It is so accurate I only use it in special occasions.

I got an incredible reading once from a guy who had designed his own system, using a normal deck of cards, according to his own complicated numerology. The guy was an innovator, but his system worked.

I have read that in the Renaissance, the Major Arcana included about 100 cards, with allusions to the arts, literature, music, and other renaissance concerns, which do not apply to the present millennium, nor to our common clients at Keen.

The correspondence between cards and meanings are not carved on stone, and although some principles are constant, like CUPS are always going to be related to emotions, while SWORDS will indicate ideas, etc, the specificity of meanings CAN be to a certain point arbitrary, according to a specific system.

Each deck may offer a different interpretation of a card according to the philosophy behind it. I am thinking of decks such as Mother Earth (of feminist ideology), or the Tarot of Osho (according to Zen Buddhism), as the Mythic Tarot uses classical mythology and interprets the world according to the specific stories of that saga.

I had a friend who was an astrologer and used the Thoth Tarot and he would relate the astrological correspondence of the cards to the personal astrological chart of his readers and with astrological forecasts. To each its own.

Each system works in its own universe. It is paradigmatic.

I see you prefer the Qabalah, with its tree of life and the sephiroth, etc. If that works for you, the more power to you. I don't do Qabalah, nor follow Crowley's Thelemic philosophy.
I use a Jungian psychology interpretation.

I also have assigned meanings to cards in a sort of personal way. And some times the cards tell me one thing and others give me some other meaning. Each card has so much symbolism, that there are plenty of elements and aspects to choose from. Being a psychic means to me to be able to choose the one value that applies to the situation.

One time I was reading to a couple and I got for both the same card of DESTINY. When I read it to her, I "saw" the wheel was static, when I saw the same card in his reading, it was moving fast. I interpreted it that she was holding on at a stand still, while he wanted to totally be in the relationship. Exactly the same card, opposite meanings according to how I "felt" it. That's the psychic part of it. And of course our ability to choose at random the appropriate card.



Thursday, July 01, 2010 2:53 AM by Mary Christianson

# thelemic order

The Law of Thelema is a system of experiential spirituality.I like to practise.
Wednesday, February 02, 2011 6:11 PM by Lisa

# re: Tarot Excellence, Not Just Imagination

Fact or fiction - the tarot is particular in scope & fundamental in origins. The ball is in play on the field, not out of bounds.  

What do you think?

(required) 
(required) 
(required) 
Enter the numbers you see into the
field below.
(required)