In this article, I wanted to adress my views on skeptics of the psychic community.
I am a skeptic, myself. I know it doesn't make much sense to be a walking contradiction; however, as a skeptic, I tend to be a lot more critical of the information I receive. I prefer verifyable information, not just general statements. When I read feedback and a client tells me that what I said was true, I am probably more surprised than my clients are.
Skeptics are a valuable asset to the metaphysical community and to consumers of psychic readings because they help keep watch on potential fraud. They teach consumers what to look for in a psychic.
The problem with skeptics; however, is that skepticism in of itself can also be considered a belief system...even a religion of sorts. It is a belief system filled with "followers" who can be just as stubborn to convert to believing in the existance of psychic abilities as a Christian, for example, would be stubborn to convert to say, Paganism.
Many a skeptic have said they would be willing to consider the possibility that psychic abilities exist, "if there is compelling evidence." The problem, here, is that this is completely arbitrary and totally up to the skeptic to decide how much evidence he or she requires to change his or her mind.
In my experience, when I have provided evidence or even documentation that could be verified by a client, they always want more. In other words, the rules keep changing because the evidence could be considered a fluke, purely anectodal or a stretching of the truth.
Two other issues are that skeptics want to define what is considered psychic ability and what is not. According to one skeptic, if someone is truly psychic, then they should be able to know the names of the client's relatives. They should know what you are thinking at any given moment. A psychic should be able to, with pinpoint precision, tell you when an event will happen, and if any party involved changes their mind, the psychic should be able to pick that up. These results should be able to be reproduced repeatedly until the skeptic is ready to consider the possibility that psychic abilities really do exist. Secondly, those results should be 100% accurate. People who are brought up on murder charges get to get off if they are able to prove it beyond a reasonable doubt. They don't need to prove it 100%.
Here is an example of when I read someone and got very specific details (not 100% accuracy) and the skeptic was still not convinced, despite being able to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that I did have an abiltiy:
Last year, a new coworker came to work for my company. I had a crush on him. Despite acting younger than his age, I got a good vibe from him and he seemed really liberal. I told him what I did part-time and he just nodded, as though it didn't matter. I thought this was a good sign.
So, we were walking down the street together and he asked me when his birthday was, as a joke. I told him I didn't know because I can't get that specific. But then I looked dead at him and said, "You are an Aries."
He stopped in his tracks and shouted, "Stop it!"
I laughed and and asked him why. He said his birthday was April 1st.
I then told him he had a big dog, it was a black lab.
"One out of 2," he said. "It was actually a yellow lab."
I shrugged. I thought it was a bit silly, to be honest. After all, it wasn't like I said he had a poodle or a Dalmation.
I asked him if he was seeing anyone and he told me that he wasn't but his ex-girlfriend was Japanese.
As plain as day, I picked up that he was not over this person, that she hurt him terribly and if he could he would take her back. I told him that he was not over her.
"One out of 3," he says with a smile.
Well, I found out from a mutual friend that he lied. He indeed was not over this woman and talked about her everyday at work to the point of driving the other coworkers mental.
Now did I display 100% accuracy? Not really. But from this story, I did display that I was picking up very specific information that I could not have known about this person.
Finally, I find that skeptics have already decided what kind of skills set a psychic should have. They have also already determined to what degree those skills should function. While I agree that there should be some sort of standard and a psychic should be able to demonstrate their skill with reasonable accuracy, the key word is: reasonable.
While I cannot speak for other psychics, I would say that my abilties are there, they are just not consistant, and I definitely let my present and potential clients know that. In my case, I have a tendency to mix up timeframes. What I think is the future, has actually already happened. Sometimes I have a problem misinterpreting what I see. On two occasions, my ego popped in because what I saw didn't make any sense. I was reading for two clients, and I saw clearly what their career or career plans were and I did not tell them before they came out with it (and no, I would not have been able to guess from the conversation). The way I connect with some people is different. While with some people I can pull up information with their question, other people, I have actually had to verify or even ask questions in order to be sure what I was seeing. Sometimes I need cards, sometimes I don't. Sometimes one ability will manifest, sometimes everything will come out, again, depending on the person. I can be on target with timing for one person and be so off target with another. At times, I have been 50/50 with past or present information, but right with the outcome. And yes, there are times I even get things wrong.
It is my opinion, based on my experience, that skeptics are not as willing to change their belief systems as some may think. That's okay. However, extreme skepticism can be just as hurtful as extreme belief. When it comes to a system of beliefs, it is sometimes interesting to note how, just because you are skeptic (or a believer), does not mean that you have the monopoly on factual information and facts can certainly be altered and adjusted to fit a belief system.
Further readings of interest (I will be updating this)
"Myth of the Million Dollar Challenge," Greg, dailygrail.com, Feb 2008
"The Ultimate Psychic Challenge-A Challenge to James Randi," Montage Keen, survivalafterdeath.org.uk, 2004
debunkingskeptics.com/contents